In a quandry
May. 31st, 2007 11:48 amOK,
so EC got back to me about Burning for Eight Days. (it's flocked, ping me if you're not friended)
1) the lez has to go. No f/f.
2) Needs more plot.
So, here is the question:
Do I revise...yet again, or do I just say "no thanks" and send it to Phaze for the Frost heatsheet?
I already submitted an earlier draft as a Frost when I hadn't head from EC.
The biggest problem with Phaze is the barJonas twins from Burning are the same as the benEzra twins that I submitted for the Frontier heat-sheet.
so EC got back to me about Burning for Eight Days. (it's flocked, ping me if you're not friended)
1) the lez has to go. No f/f.
2) Needs more plot.
So, here is the question:
Do I revise...yet again, or do I just say "no thanks" and send it to Phaze for the Frost heatsheet?
I already submitted an earlier draft as a Frost when I hadn't head from EC.
The biggest problem with Phaze is the barJonas twins from Burning are the same as the benEzra twins that I submitted for the Frontier heat-sheet.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 05:01 pm (UTC)I just wondered.
For myself, I didn't think the story needed 'more sex' back when they were asking for it. (Another thing authors were complaining about)
Aha! Found the link. http://karenknowsbest.blogspot.com/2007/04/so-whats-really-going-on-at-elloras.html
And is the story about the twins exactly the same? Could you create a universe with those twins for Phaze?
no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 03:24 am (UTC)Some stuff is brilliant
Ariel and David benEzra look, act and sound almost exactly like Mishael and David barJonas. Identical twins, both brilliant, one more techy.
The stories aren't the same but are both cyberpunkish. In "Pushing the boundaries of reality" they are seducing a netrunner and trying to bring things out of the net and into the real world.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-03 10:44 pm (UTC)Karen Scott
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 05:01 pm (UTC)Um. I think you might be a tad up a creek here. Slightly bad form to submit it somewhere else when it's under consideration from EC. If you don't hear from them, you have to officially withdraw it before you can send it out again. But between the two, you'll make more money with EC, so if you were going to skip out on one of them, I'd say stomp Phaze.
But there's more than money involved. Perhaps if you say "never mind then" they'll back off and let you keep the lesbian scene. Or can it be rewritten as a menage? I had a threesome scene with two women and a man, and they let me get away with that.
Tough call, hon. How much do you love this piece? I switched imprints so I could keep the NU stories the way I wanted them because I loved them, but I did whatever they told me to with TANDEM because I wanted money. It's all a tightrope.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 03:28 am (UTC)Phaze is going to get a really nice note saying "I'm so sorry, here, please have two guys celebrating the solstice" (or something similar)
This is not a "God, I'll die if they change one word of my deathless prose" piece. It's just a "oh crap, here we go again, and I have no idea what to do about the plot part."
I do have a solution for the lesbian scene tho'. The sex goes, and the talk and booze stay
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 05:15 pm (UTC)THat being said, it wouldnt be the end of the world to change it to a menage, or even replace her with a man.
This final call is totally up to you. Revise or resubmit as you wish, I dont really have a preferance.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 03:32 am (UTC)I think it adds to the build-up: visiting and getting turned on by Janis, then voyuering Cupid and then taking the plunge for actual sex.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 05:01 pm (UTC)Your call, hon.
Date: 2007-05-31 07:27 pm (UTC)Re: Your call, hon.
Date: 2007-06-02 03:39 am (UTC)Maybe postpone the deal with Daddy until Valentine's and get a failed romance with the real Sean and have her tempted to retreat to her box instead...
But that doesn't feel like plot, it feels like a scene, and I'm not sure imploding romances sell.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 09:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 03:40 am (UTC)