An upsetting thought about the new HP
Jul. 18th, 2005 05:24 pmThis talks about a minor character and his story, and lycanthropy as a metaphor for gayness.
Throughout PoA and the other books, Lupin's lycanthropy can be read as a code for him being gay. I won't belabor the point. It's there to the point my 13, who is just starting to get subtext, can see it.
Now, we are introduced to the werewolf that bit (read: molested) Lupin when he was a child. We're told he prefers children so he can poison their minds against the wizarding world that casts them out.
If this isn't code for pedophilia, and the ugly notion that gays recruit children, I don't know what is.
We're told the wizarding society is so lycan-phobic it would send its children to live with werewolves rather than raise them, even with wolfsbane potion. We're told that werewolves are against civilization and actively working to destroy it.
And we're shown that the love of a good woman (Tonks, Fleur) can fixthe gay lycanthropes and make them civilized. (OK, Bill probably won't transform, but I bet he'll go all wolfish)
I'm disturbed and starting to get pissed off. I'll see what Bunny thinks after she reads it, without saying anything about my ideas to her.
Throughout PoA and the other books, Lupin's lycanthropy can be read as a code for him being gay. I won't belabor the point. It's there to the point my 13, who is just starting to get subtext, can see it.
Now, we are introduced to the werewolf that bit (read: molested) Lupin when he was a child. We're told he prefers children so he can poison their minds against the wizarding world that casts them out.
If this isn't code for pedophilia, and the ugly notion that gays recruit children, I don't know what is.
We're told the wizarding society is so lycan-phobic it would send its children to live with werewolves rather than raise them, even with wolfsbane potion. We're told that werewolves are against civilization and actively working to destroy it.
And we're shown that the love of a good woman (Tonks, Fleur) can fix
I'm disturbed and starting to get pissed off. I'll see what Bunny thinks after she reads it, without saying anything about my ideas to her.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-19 12:58 am (UTC)1) weren't paying attention.
2) aren't gay.
3) don't do subtext.
A queer viewpoint on movies and books is very different from a straight one. Lupin's lycanthropy is generally accepted as code for gayness.
In fact, in the film of PoA (I haven't read the book in a very long time), he comments "They wouldn't want a...well, someone like me, teaching their children." Which isn't even coded anymore.
In HBP, he talks about Fenrir, the werewolf who made him, as one with a taste for children, and about his journeys among the lycanthropes.
It's all there, if you're reading from a queer PoV.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-19 01:06 am (UTC)What the heck about "They wouldn't want a...well, someone like me, teaching their children." Which isn't even coded anymore.
Hun, that's not code for anything. It could be infered to "black/gay/unmarried/etc" add your flavor.
I think what we got here is the slash/straight persective. If you're looking for it, you find it whether it is there or not.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-19 04:06 am (UTC)But I do see your point, Val. (Or what is the short version of your name?) I hadn't quite thought about it that far.
On the other hand, Tonks's love does not change the fact that Remus is a werewolf. And he has always been shown as pretty civilized on his own.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-07 02:48 am (UTC)I answer to Val.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-07 03:32 am (UTC)