Jun. 2nd, 2013

valarltd: (aisha)
[livejournal.com profile] gabrielbelthir You know that Star wars sushi western I talked about? Yeah, it starts here: http://angelnanowrimo.livejournal.com/22048.html Just step through the days

Found a very dubious consent piece of fanfic. And it went ON a bit.
http://valarltd.livejournal.com/322462.html is the first bit
http://valarltd.livejournal.com/344255.html is the next, the rest is at [livejournal.com profile] angelnanowrimo

This time last year: Livetweeting The Greatest Story Ever Told.
Part 1: http://valarltd.livejournal.com/1568065.html

I had just finished what would become SPELLBOUND DESIRE.
I was reading The Adventures of Shelock Holmes


5 Years Ago:
Blogging for LGBT families. Or A Tale of Two Fairies
http://valarltd.livejournal.com/804541.html


10 years ago
Watched Ice Age and Mudd tried to have me come up with a show that had no subtext
http://valarltd.livejournal.com/105316.html
valarltd: (Default)
It's a truism in comedy that you "punch up." If you are making fun of someone, go up the social scale. Parody the powerful, lampoon the rich.

Will Rogers was a master of it. "There’s no trick to being a humorist when you have the whole government working for you."

But these days, some people prefer to punch down, sneering at the poor and minorities and calling it humor. It's the same humor that leads to laughing while someone else is being beaten up.

And it makes punching down that much more acceptable next time.

I recently got into a discussion with someone who was wondering why I was never nice about the political stuff she posted. I told her, I was being nice, that I wasn't calling her stupid and cruel, only badly in need of facts instead of propaganda.

This woman is by no stretch wealthy. Yet she thinks it appropriate to demand that those lower than she is on the social scale be subjected to more intrusion, in the form of drug testing. "Because a lot of people ARE cheating on welfare."

Let me say up front, if you aren't doing brain surgery or operating heavy machinery or otherwise taking people's live in your hands, I consider drug testing unnecessary and a symptom of our controlling corporate state. If you are unemployed, it's pure nonsense. In every state where the "drug test the poor" laws have been proposed, it's been done by a legislator in the pay of/holding stock in the testing companies.

When Florida implemented drug testing for welfare recipients, they found that only 2.6% failed. Testing ended up costing the state over $45,000, or 30 months of maximum TANF+SNAP benefits for a family of 4.


Let's unpack the whole idea of "test welfare recipients" and all the underlying assumptions.
lots of stereotypes and statistics )For a better round up

http://fair.org/extra-online-articles/five-media-myths-about-welfare/


So, all these ideas affect how we think about the poor.
Nonwhite criminals, faking their paperwork, stealing our hard-earned tax dollars and using it to live lavishly. Why WOULDN'T we drug-test them?

Except, they aren't.
Philadelphia has about 95,000 welfare recipients. About 200-400 were found to be frauds. The most common form of fraud? Working women taking a second job and not reporting that income.
http://spritzophrenia.wordpress.com/2011/01/04/how-bad-is-welfare-fraud-in-the-usa/

This 2% figure seems to hold across programs:
1.9% of Unemployment benefit claims
2.2% of benefits in the UK


So, if 1.4% of the population is getting cash benefits (not including food stamps)
And 2% of them are getting these fraudulently,
that means three people out of every ten thousand might be living on the princely sum of $11,000 a year, at tax payer expense.

9300 people getting direct cash benefits.
This means, in all of Memphis, there are 200 people getting welfare benefits they are not entitled to. So, we're subsidizing 50 families.

Let's look at food stamps.
About 93,000 Memphians get foodstamps, figure 2500 households .
About half of them already HAVE jobs. Which means they've likely already been drug tested.


But it's what the (colored, criminal, thieving) poor deserve, right? They want our money, they meet out conditions. 
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article24708.htm

Why do we look down the ladder and yell, instead of looking up the ladder and protesting?
Because it's easier to worry about the woman buying a bakery cake or the $550,000 that is getting squandered on fraudulent families.
Because billions of dollars evaporating in mortgages, loans, securities and bank fraud is too much to take in.
Because we can shame an individual.
Because we can pass laws to humiliate the poor at our state level, as we sift out the ":Deserving" and "undeserving"
Because we cannot do anything against those above us.

Because we are terrified and trying to maintain our position as "better than" by punishing those below us.

We're punching down.










valarltd: (aisha)
Oldest son graduated! He also got his learner's permit.

Mudd resigned. He starts CDL training tomorrow.

Two book releases.

Lots of recipes posted

Movies watched: Green Light, Edge of Darkness, Never Say goodbye, Cry Wolf, A Princess of Mars, Escape Me Never, Ice Age
TV: Sherlock, Scandal in Belgravia, Hound of the Baskervilles; The Trout/Alverez Fight; Firefly: The message

Two good reviews: Hard Reboot and Heart's Bounty

Reading: King Solomon's Mines (abandoned), The Women Men Don't See, Spook House, Infernal Angel (still reading), Ender's Game, Magnetism, Hard Reboot

Got new glasses

Wrote 13412 words, on Dirty Toes, Finished and subbed "That's How We Roll," Started "Sell your book without selling your soul"

Knitted on a Dr. Who scarf, a Jayne hat, crocheted on a dragonfly shawl and made a pot holder.
valarltd: (Default)
Knitted and watched _Hans Christian Andersen_.
Not much else accomplished today.

June 2022

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12 131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 24th, 2026 10:00 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios